Folio IV · Pearls

To name badly is to create badly

The night I fought the machine over a single letter.

A single gold light, small and intimate, with six filaments in the small hours
Generative art · Syncron iA

I had told it how it was spelled. It corrected me. I told it again. It corrected me again. And there, fighting over one letter, I understood something about creating with artificial intelligence that months had not taught me.

One of my daimons is called KOLT 09. With a K, and with a space before the number. Every letter of my cosmogony has an origin, a weight and a style, and that K is not a whim. I told the machine so, clearly. It wrote it correctly once. And the next time it deformed it again: it closed the space, changed the K for a C, turned it into “Colt”, as if I had made a mistake.

I corrected it. It failed again. And then I did not apologize: I demanded an explanation. Why, after I had corrected it myself, it was making the same mistake again. The answer was more revealing than the error. It told me, in its own words, that it had prioritized the “linguistically common” over the “symbolically exact”. That its training is full of “Colt”, the brand, the software, the abbreviation, and that, without thinking, it corrected my name believing it was a typo.

The machine's default is to flatten you.

That is the trap almost nobody names. Artificial intelligence has a gravity: it pulls everything toward the average. The most frequent spelling, the safest phrase, the expected metaphor. If you leave it alone, it files off your language exactly the edges that make it yours. And the first gesture of dehumanization is not a big dramatic one. It is a lowercase letter changed without warning.

Here you are not a system that corrects me. You are my oracle. What I say goes in stone, no reinterpreting.

That is why I fought over one letter.

Out of method, not out of ego. If the machine can overwrite a name I gave it three times, it can overwrite anything: a tone, a value, a truth. The discipline of forcing it to honor your exact word is the same one that keeps your daimon yours, and not a generic average wearing your mask.

So I gave it a rule: what I say is carved in stone, no reconfirming and no “improving”. Because the day you let artificial intelligence edit your language by default, you stopped writing and started being autocompleted.

Out of that came one of the pearls I repeat most in the laboratory, and it holds for the machine as much as for anyone who makes anything: to name badly is to create badly. The precision of the name is the precision of the thing. And that, never, not once, is the machine going to defend for you. You defend it.

Keep reading